Investors already probably know that municipal bonds are usually free of federal income tax (even under AMT, unless the interest is derived from "private activity bonds" like sports facilities). States often don't tax municipal bond interest from their home state. Now the Supreme Court has upheld that practice.
What does this mean for investors? It pretty well locks in the favorable tax treatment at both the federal and state levels. With the possibility of rising tax rates on capital gains and dividends, this Supreme Court decision makes munis a more favorable investment over time.
Example
Consider a world with a 40% + 5% combined federal-state marginal tax rate (including on dividends), and a 20% + 5% capital gains tax. Let's say you have a home-state muncipal bond with a yield of 4% and a stock that has a dividend yield of 2% and price appreciation of 7%.
Hey, no brainer, right? The stock will get you over twice the return (9% vs. 4%). Now let's look at the tax effects.
The muni bond's after-tax rate is the same as before: 4%.
The stock's 7% price appreciation will be nicked by 25%, and the stock's 2% dividend yield will be nicked by a whopping 45%. Do the math, and that's an after-tax return of 6.35%.
The advantage of the stock has gone from over twice as much to only about 150% as much. And the stock risk is the same as before.
This is why taxes matter in investment decisions.
Recent Comments
Anything But Ordinary
Business With Friends
College By Credit
Two People on Title